Ayesha Siddiqa
A MQM worker was killed in Rangers’ custody – a
reminder of the old tradition of lack of accountability of law enforcement and
the overall security apparatus of the state. Torture and its most crude form:
extra-judicial killing takes place all in the name of providing security. But
we are not sure if such measures contribute to peace and stability. I am
reminded of what a senior police officer once told me the problem was with such
above the law mechanisms. In torturing people to death or killing them without
following the course of law we often forget that the person has people who love
him/her. They will always get back at you and in case the power is
disproportionate they may not get back at the powerful but the powerless.
I
realize that this is unattractive for those who are burnt by weakness of the
law enforcement and judicial system and have little faith left in it. For
societies to survive you can’t have shot cuts. Military courts cannot replace
real courts, and torture and extra-judicial killings is not real retribution to
restore sense of justice.
At
this point in time when a lot of people seem excited about extra-constitutional
use of force restoring peace one is reminded of the dire need of the need of
accountability of the law enforcement system. It has become even more important
to guard and question the guardians. Let’s examine two important incidents
which have happened in the recent past.
The
first pertains to death of Malik Ishaq, a leader of the militant organization
Lashkare Jhangavi. Many gave the security establishment a thumbs-up for killing
a man who had spilt blood of hundreds. Intriguingly, the state desisted from
punishing him for his heinous crimes through a judicial process. I am reminded
of conversations with senior law enforcement officials in Punjab, who would
argue during Ishaq’s life time, that there was no threat from the militant
leader, and that indeed he was a friend of Pakistan’s and didn’t want to bring
any harm. No heed was ever given to the fact that he was proven guilty in
killing an Iranian diplomat and for killing numerous other people. He was even
proven guilty in the eyes of the judicial system which we decry. There was
sufficient evidence against him. But none of that was honored. Furthermore, he
was released by the Supreme Court that was the final court of appeal, in the
absence of new evidence which would have allowed the judges to do so. There are
questions to be asked about why did Justices Iftikhar Ch and Dogar do so? In
the same vain why was he never really stopped from instigating killings of
Hazaras in Baluchistan? And finally what triggered the decision to conduct his
extra-judicial killing?
Let’s
not forget that extra-judicial means break down of law and power of those that the
state thinks it has punished. Had Ishaq been put through the course of law
without having the power to intimidate his witnesses, as he did in the past,
his guilt would hgave been proved and people convinced of how he was a
terrorist and a burden on the society. A secret death makes him a hero that
will inspire some to eulogize and copy. It also demonstrated that there is no
judicial system. Hence, even when a killer ws punished as in the case of Mumtaz
Qadri people remain skeptical. Why should the law perform now when it has never
done so before? If the law can’t bring Ishaq to justice then why should it in
Qadri’s case? Its difficult to ignore such rumblings in the minds of many.
The
second incident pertains to operation against the Chotu gang. The death of 72
innocent people in Lahore seems to have resulted in a sequence of events – a
sudden announcement that there was need for a cleanup operation in Punjab
followed by the security establishment zooming-in on this gang in the tribal
areas of Punjab leading to an armed operation. Suddenly, Chotu became the
source of all evil and crime spread from Rahim Yar Khan to Dera Ghazi Khan. It
was overnight that a hooligan and criminal was transformed into a terrorist who
had questioned the state and tried to break it. All force had to be deployed
against him. Expert analysts even wrote amazing pieces outlining effective
strategies to overpower such phenomenal source of evil.
Of
course, the law enforcement apparatus did not even allow to ask the question
whether Chotu was over-rated. No one was even encouraged to find out if the
criminal was of the worth that required deployment of an army corps and
gun-ship helicopters? Since the end of the operation no one has dared ask the
cost and effort incurred to capture just thirteen men. There is certainly
little interest in law enforcement officials disclosing how they were part of
the ‘wheat war’ being fought between them and these criminals in the tribal
areas. Not having extra-regional supply network the gang would try to sell
millions of rupees worth of wheat in the process of which they would encounter
extortion by the police. The conflict over share of spoils heated up resulting
in abduction and killing of policemen last year and even this year. No one has
even bothered to inquire where did the millions of rupees worth of wheat
disappear last year or this year after the operation.
At
the end of the day, Chotu is a criminal and not a terrorist. Criminals indicate
poor governance and presence of militants, especially with compliance of the
state denotes criminality of the state. But both elements increase where the
overall state apparatus lacks accountability and transparency. The people have
to know facts of the latest operation. They also need to know the elements behind
the Lahore attack as much as they need to find out facts about killing of 140
children in Peshawar. These disconnected myths, hidden truths and wrong tools
to restore stability is a lethal combination. It will never bring peace or
sanity. You can’t have law above law.
